Fitza v. Oliver Adjustment Company of Kenosha and Racine Inc et al
Plaintiff: Peter Fitza
Defendant: AmerAssist AR Solutions Inc and Oliver Adjustment Company of Kenosha and Racine Inc
Case Number: 2:2019cv00238
Filed: February 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2019 Case Terminated (vkb)
March 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 3/12/2019. On March 11, 2019, the plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlement as to Defendant Oliver Adjustment Company of Kenosha and Racine, Inc., indicating that the parties had reached a settlement agreement and that they anticipated filing a notice of dismissal within 45 days. Dkt. No. 5. The court ORDERS that this case is administratively closed pending the filing of dismissal documents. The court further ORDERS that when those dismissal documents are filed, the court will convert the closure to the resolution required by the pleading. Note: there is no document associated with this text only order. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
March 11, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement as to Defendant Oliver Adjustment Company of Kenosha and Racine Inc by Peter Fitza. (DeLadurantey, Nathan)
March 7, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE by Peter Fitza Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant AmerAssist AR Solutions Inc Only (DeLadurantey, Nathan)
February 15, 2019 Summons Issued as to All Defendants (vkb)
February 14, 2019 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Peter Fitza. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (DeLadurantey, Nathan)
February 14, 2019 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Peter Fitza. (DeLadurantey, Nathan)
February 14, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against AmerAssist AR Solutions Inc, Oliver Adjustment Company of Kenosha and Racine Inc by Peter Fitza. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-3032644) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons AmerAssist, #3 Summons OAC)(DeLadurantey, Nathan)
February 14, 2019 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Jones to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fitza v. Oliver Adjustment Company of Kenosha and Racine Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter Fitza
Represented By: Nathan E DeLadurantey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AmerAssist AR Solutions Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oliver Adjustment Company of Kenosha and Racine Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?