Binkele v. Ausloos
Robert Binkele |
Adam J Ausloos |
2:2019cv00249 |
February 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
J P Stadtmueller |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 REPLY BRIEF in Support filed by Robert Binkele re #5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . (Wolper, Alan) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion filed by Robert Binkele re #11 MOTION to Set Aside Default . (Wolper, Alan) |
Filing 15 UNPUBLISHED Decision Points & Authorities and Unpublished Order filed by Adam J Ausloos (Heller, Michael) |
Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Adam Ausloos Opposing Pl Mot for Prelim Injunction. (Heller, Michael) |
Filing 13 BRIEF in Opposition filed by Adam J Ausloos re #5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Def Brief Opposing Pl Mot for Injunction)(Heller, Michael) |
NOTICE of Electronic Filing Error re #12 Brief in Support of Motion, filed by Adam J Ausloos. The affidavit should have been filed as a separate entry. This document does not need to be re-filed; Please refer to the policies and procedures for electronic case filing and the user manual found at www.wied.uscourts.gov (blr) |
Filing 12 BRIEF in Support filed by Adam J Ausloos re #11 MOTION to Set Aside Default . (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Heller Affidavit Supporting Motion to Set Aside Default, #2 Exhibits to Brief Supporting Motion to Set Aside Default)(Heller, Michael) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Set Aside Default by Adam J Ausloos. (Heller, Michael) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Adam J Ausloos.(Heller, Michael) |
Due to non-consent, case reassigned to Judge J P Stadtmueller. Magistrate Judge William E Duffin no longer assigned to the case. (mlm) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Entry of Default and Entry of Default Judgment by Robert Binkele. (Wolper, Alan) |
Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Adam J Ausloos. (mlm) |
Filing 8 DISCLOSURE Statement by Adam J Ausloos. (Heller, Michael) |
NOTICE to Defendant - Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement should have been filed with your first pleading. Please file your disclosure statement within 7 days (mlm) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Robert Binkele. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Wolper, Alan) |
NOTICE from the clerk to Defendant requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin be filed within 21 days; the form is available at the court's web site: www.wied.uscourts.gov (mlm) |
Filing 6 BRIEF in Support filed by Robert Binkele re #5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - FINRA Statement of Claim, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration, #3 Exhibit 3 - Contract)(Wolper, Alan) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Robert Binkele. (Wolper, Alan) |
Filing 4 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE by Michael Heller on behalf of the defendant. Robert Binkele Acceptance of Service (Wolper, Alan) |
Summons Issued as to Adam J Ausloos. (mlm) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Robert Binkele. (Wolper, Alan) |
Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Robert Binkele (Wolper, Alan) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl) |
NOTICE of Electronic Filing Error re #1 Complaint filed by Robert Binkele. The exhibits were not labeled. Also, the description of the attachments contains duplicate text. In the future, when attaching documents to the main document you may select a description from the category drop-down list but then you should not repeat that word in the description text box. For example, if you choose Exhibit from the drop-down list, then you may simply type A in the description text box and Exhibit A will appear on the docket. This document does not need to be re-filed; Please refer to the policies and procedures for electronic case filing and the user manual found at www.wied.uscourts.gov (mlm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against Adam J Ausloos by Robert Binkele. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-3034979) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4)(Wolper, Alan) Modified on 2/19/2019 (mlm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Binkele v. Ausloos | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert Binkele | |
Represented By: | Alan M Wolper |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Adam J Ausloos | |
Represented By: | Michael G Heller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.