Kaur v. Receivables Performance Management LLC
| Kuldeep Kaur |
| Receivables Performance Management LLC |
| 2:2019cv00251 |
| February 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| David E Jones |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel E Feinberg on behalf of Receivables Performance Management LLC. Attorney(s) appearing: Daniel E. Feinberg (Feinberg, Daniel) |
| NOTICE from the clerk to defendant requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge David E. Jones be filed within 21 days; the form is available at the court's web site: www.wied.uscourts.gov (amb) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Receivables Performance Management LLC - Waiver sent on 3/12/2019. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Kuldeep Kaur. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 4
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge David E Jones on 02/20/2019. Plaintiff must file proof of service of the complaint or a report on the status of service for each defendant within 45 days of the date of this order. There is no document attached to this order. (cc: all counsel)(amb)
|
| Summons Issued as to Receivables Performance Management LLC. (amb) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge David E Jones ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Jones to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Kuldeep Kaur. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Kuldeep Kaur. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Receivables Performance Management LLC by Kuldeep Kaur. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-3035059) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Eldridge, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kaur v. Receivables Performance Management LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Receivables Performance Management LLC | |
| Represented By: | Daniel E Feinberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kuldeep Kaur | |
| Represented By: | Mark A Eldridge |
| Represented By: | Jesse Fruchter |
| Represented By: | John D Blythin |
| Represented By: | Ben J Slatky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
