Young v. McArdle
| Marlon T Young |
| Warden Gary Boughton, Erin M Wehrle, Karen R Lee, Sandy McArdle and Sandra McArdle |
| 2:2019cv01352 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 TRANSMIT Order, Complaint, Notice, Waiver and Consent forms to US Marshal for service upon defendant Sandra McArdle. (bx) (Main Document 13 replaced on 11/12/2019) (bx). |
| Filing 12 NON-ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to Sandra McArdle. (Bachhuber, Rachel) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Limited Notice of Appearance for Sandra McArdle. Defendant McArdle is not a state employee and will not be represented by WI DOJ. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Bachhuber, Rachel) |
Filing 10
SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/29/2019. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee #2 is GRANTED. The plaintiff's motion to pay the filing fee with his release account #7 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED defendants Lee, Wehrle, and Boughton are dismissed from this case. ORDERED that, under the informal service agreement, the defendant shall file a responsive pleading to the complaint within 60 days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody of the plaintiff shall collect from the plaintiff's prison trust account the balance of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be sent to the officer in charge of the agency where plaintiff is confined. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may not begin discovery until after the court enters a scheduling order setting deadlines for discovery and dispositive motions. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff, warden) (lls)
|
| INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $36.74, receipt number MK4689-079965. ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department (jcl) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST by Marlon T Young to make Dodge Correctional Institution send his initial partial filing fee to the Court. (tlf) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/3/19 that the plaintiff is assessed $36.74 as an initial partial payment of the $350.00 fee for filing this case. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff, financial, warden)(jad)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Order to release account funds for filing fee by Marlon T Young. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Marlon T Young. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lh) |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Marlon T Young. (lh) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from the Clerk to Marlon T Young regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (cc: All Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet)(tlf) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to Marlon Young re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (lh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Marlon T Young. (lh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/17/2019: #1 Information Request regarding trust statement and disbursement request) (lh). |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT (unsigned) against All Defendants by Marlon T Young. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
