Walton v. Saul
| Calvin L Walton |
| Andrew M Saul |
| 2:2020cv00427 |
| March 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Skutch Cohn on behalf of Andrew M Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Emily S. Cohn (Cohn, Emily)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 4/6/2020. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Pamela Pepper no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
|
Filing 8
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
|
|
Filing 7
Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to parties. By 5/26/2020 defendant to file and serve certified administrative record. Plaintiff's brief due 7/6/2020; defendant's response due 8/17/2020; plaintiff's reply due 9/1/2020. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
|
|
Filing 6
DECLARATION of SERVICE (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Calvin L Walton. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
FILING FEE Received: $400.00, receipt number MK4689-082017. (jcl)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 3/20/2020. By 4/10/2020 plaintiff to file amended request to proceed without prepaying filing fee using this court's form. Failure to file by deadline will result in denial of motion and requirement to pay full filing fee. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Calvin L Walton. (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 2
DISCLOSURE Statement by Calvin L Walton. (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 1
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Calvin L Walton (Attachments: #1 ALJ decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schultz, Barry)
|
|
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Walton v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Represented By: | Emily Skutch Cohn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Calvin L Walton | |
| Represented By: | Barry A Schultz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
