Lee v. Radtke
Petitioner: Jeffery Depaul Lee
Respondent: Dylon Radtke
Case Number: 2:2020cv00766
Filed: May 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Nancy Joseph
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (ds)
July 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Dylon Radtke. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Burgundy, Sarah)
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to Dylon Radtke (Collins, Winn)
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RULE 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph. IT IS ORDERED THAT a copy of Lee's petition and this order shall be served upon the respondent by service upon the State of Wisconsin Attorney General. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the respondent is directed to serve and file an answer, motion, or other response to the petition, complying with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases, within SIXTY (60) days of the date of this order. See order for additional details. (cc: all counsel, via US Mail to Petitioner )(ds)
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE from the clerk to Respondent requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph be filed within 21 days; the form is available at the court's web site: www.wied.uscourts.gov. (ds)
June 19, 2020 Opinion or Order FILING FEE Received: $5, receipt number GB4689005688. (lh)
June 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 LETTER from the Clerk to Jeffery Depaul Lee regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (cc: All Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet)(tlf)
May 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Jeffery Depaul Lee. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (mac)
May 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to Jeffery Lee re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting payment of the full filing fee or that a petition to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee and six-month certified trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (lh)
May 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jeffery Depaul Lee. (Attachments: #1 Bookmarked exhibits)(lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Radtke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dylon Radtke
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions
Represented By: Sarah L Burgundy
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeffery Depaul Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?