Voeks v. Out Tech Inc
Plaintiff: Megan Voeks and Estate of Julie Voeks
Defendant: Out Tech Inc doing business as Bureau of Account Management
Case Number: 2:2020cv01613
Filed: October 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Brett Ludwig
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge Brett Ludwig on 10/23/20 granting #3 Motion to Stay; granting #3 Motion for Relief; terminating #3 Motion to Certify Class for administrative purposes only. (cc: all counsel) (MP)
October 23, 2020 Summons Issued as to Out Tech Inc. (vkb)
October 22, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Fulton Dental / Damasco), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion to certify class until the scheduling conference, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from the Local Rules setting automatic briefing schedules and requiring briefs and supporting material to be filed with the motion (Civil L.R. 7(a), 7(d)) by Megan Voeks. (Blythin, John)
October 22, 2020 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Megan Voeks. (Blythin, John)
October 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Out Tech Inc by Megan Voeks. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3613434) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit B: envelope containing Ex. A, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons on Defendant)(Blythin, John)
October 22, 2020 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Brett Ludwig; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (cmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Voeks v. Out Tech Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Voeks
Represented By: John D Blythin
Represented By: Ben J Slatky
Represented By: Jesse Fruchter
Represented By: Mark A Eldridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Estate of Julie Voeks
Represented By: John D Blythin
Represented By: Ben J Slatky
Represented By: Jesse Fruchter
Represented By: Mark A Eldridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Out Tech Inc doing business as Bureau of Account Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?