Williams v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Saraya Deneshiana Mari Williams and Saraya DM Williams
Defendant: Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Captain Ann Dahlberg
Case Number: 2:2020cv01714
Filed: November 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Stephen C Dries
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2020 INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $48.13, receipt number MK4689-4689084923. ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department (cmb)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that on or before 1/9/2021 plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $ 48.13 as an initial partial filing fee in this action signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries on 12/9/2020. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party and Warden, Robert Ellsworth CC)(kah)
December 7, 2020 Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Saraya DM Williams. (kah)
November 23, 2020 Filing 6 LETTER from Plaintiff regarding request for trust account statement. (kah)
November 23, 2020 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Saraya DM Williams. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (kah)
November 13, 2020 Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (amb)
November 13, 2020 Filing 3 INCOMPLETE Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Saraya Deneshiana Mari Williams. (amb)
November 13, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Saraya Deneshiana Mari Williams. (amb)
November 13, 2020 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Saraya Deneshiana Mari Williams. (amb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Captain Ann Dahlberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saraya Deneshiana Mari Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saraya DM Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?