Ratliff v. Litisha et al
| Bruce T Ratliff |
| Litisha and Racine County Jail |
| 2:2020cv01823 |
| December 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Bruce T Ratliff. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (bx) |
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 12/15/2020. ORDERING that Plaintiffs payment of his initial partial filing fee is WAIVED;IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before January 15, 2021,Plaintiff may file a letter with the court stating that he does not wish toproceed with this action, in accordance with the directions provided above; see order (cc: all counsel and via mailed to pro se party and Warden)(bx)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (bx) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Bruce T Ratliff. (bx) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Bruce T Ratliff. (bx) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury filed against All Defendants by Bruce T Ratliff. (bx) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
