Earsley v. Meisner et al
Steven Earsley |
Warden Meisner, Deputy Warden Barber, Security Director McHugh, Security Director Congdon, Unit Supervisor Schroeder, Captain Larson, Captain Albertson, HSU Manager Thompson, Sgt Lehman, Correctional Officer Isenburg, Correctional Officer Sroka, Correctional Officer Fultz, Jane Doe and Warden Cromwell |
2:2021cv01015 |
August 30, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Stephen C Dries |
Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Steven Earsley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits to Motion)(kah) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Steven Earsley. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (amb) |
FILING FEE Received: $402.00, receipt number 4689087442. (cmb) |
Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting payment of the full filing fee or that a petition to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee and six-month certified trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (amb) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against All Defendants by Steven Earsley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.