Franklin Community Advocates Inc et al v. City of Franklin
| Franklin Community Advocates Inc, Woodlake Village Homeowners Association, Chad Zolecki, Jeff Kenney, Nick Poplar, Tom Benning, Mike Zolecki, Ryan Ringwelski, Eric Balcerowski, Karyn Zolecki, Danelle Kenney, Rachel Ringwelski, Maggie Poplar, Alice Benning, Joanne Zolecki and Michelle Balcerowski |
| City of Franklin |
| 2:2022cv00413 |
| April 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 BRIEF in Support filed by City of Franklin re #17 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. (Bitar, Remzy) |
| Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT of Glen Morrow . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - MMSD & City of Franklin RCI Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - Muskego and City of Franklin RCI Agreement)(Bitar, Remzy) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss by City of Franklin. (Bitar, Remzy) |
| Filing 16 EXHIBIT Exhibit 4 to Amended Complaint - Property Value Impact Report Part 2 by All Plaintiffs. (Cincotta, Joseph) |
| Filing 15 EXHIBIT Exhibit 4 to Amended Complaint - Property Value Impact Report Part 1 by All Plaintiffs. (Cincotta, Joseph) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT Amended Complaint with corrected title to replace Doc No. 13 against filed by All Plaintiffs against City of Franklin filed by Franklin Community Advocates Inc.(Cincotta, Joseph) Modified on 5/18/2022 (asc). |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiffs against City of Franklin against All Plaintiffs filed by Franklin Community Advocates Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Comments from Bear Development and email with Mayor, #2 Exhibit 2 - Initial Depiction of TID District 6, #3 Exhibit 4 Second depiction of business park TID 6, #4 Exhibit 4A - Aerial plan view of property impact and loss, #5 Exhibit 5 - Public Comment from Bear Development, #6 Exhibit 6 - Mayor Statements on Strauss Deal, #7 Exhibit 7 - OSHA settlement notice, #8 Exhibit 8 - USDA Violation Notice, #9 Exhibit 9 - Strauss Withdrawal of project, #10 Exhibit 10 - Comments by President of Strauss, #11 Exhibit 11 - Aerial Plan view of Plaintiffs Properties, #12 Exhibit 12 - Police Incident Report on Strauss, #13 Exhibit 13 - Emails from Strauss to Mayor)(Cincotta, Joseph) Modified on 5/18/2022 (asc). |
| Filing 12 LETTER from Sadie Zurfluh re Clarification of Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss. (Zurfluh, Sadie) |
Filing 11
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 4/27/2022. By end of day 5/17/2022, plaintiffs to file either amended complaint or response to defendant's motion to dismiss. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
| Filing 10 BRIEF in Support filed by City of Franklin re #7 MOTION to Dismiss . (Bitar, Remzy) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Remzy Bitar . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Amended Complaint)(Bitar, Remzy) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Heath Eddy . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - GRAEF Engineering Study, #2 Exhibit 2 - CSM, #3 Exhibit 3 - Rezoning Application, #4 Exhibit 4 - Preliminary Plat, #5 Exhibit 5 - TIF 6 Project Plan, #6 Exhibit 6 - Creation Documents for TID #'s 1-5, 7, 8, #7 Exhibit 7 - Resolution No. 2018-7428, #8 Exhibit 8 - Letter from Accurate Appraisal, #9 Exhibit 9 - Memorandum from Chris Kaempfer, #10 Exhibit 10 - USDA Notice of Suspension Held in Abeyance)(Bitar, Remzy) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by City of Franklin. (Bitar, Remzy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lucas C Logic on behalf of City of Franklin. Attorney(s) appearing: Lucas C. Logic (Logic, Lucas) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Remzy D Bitar on behalf of City of Franklin. Attorney(s) appearing: Remzy D. Bitar (Bitar, Remzy) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Defendant served on 4/6/2022. (Cincotta, Joseph) Modified on 4/28/2022 (asc). |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by All Plaintiffs. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Cincotta, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by All Plaintiffs. (Cincotta, Joseph) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
| Summons Issued as to City of Franklin. (asc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Complaint by Franklin Community Advocates and its members against City of Franklin with Jury Demand; against All Plaintiffs by Franklin Community Advocates, Inc.. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4079290) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Public Comment by Bear, #2 Exhibit 2 - Aerial view of original development plan, #3 Exhibit 3 - Aerial Plan revised development plan, #4 Exhibit 4 - Expert property devaluation study, #5 Exhibit 5 - Public Comment by Developer, #6 Exhibit 6 - Public Comment by City, #7 Exhibit 7 - OSHA settlement release, #8 Exhibit 8 - USDA Order, #9 Exhibit 9 - Strauss Withdrawal Letter, #10 Exhibit 10 - Email on withdrawal of development, #11 Exhibit 11 - Aerial plan view of plaintiffs properties, #12 Exhibit 12 - Police Incident Report, #13 Summons Summons)(Cincotta, Joseph) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/4/2022: #14 Civil Cover Sheet) (jcl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
