Cannon v. Rudebush et al
| Marcus D Cannon |
| Alice A Rudebush, Raymond Robert Rutz, III and Brett P Kaydo |
| 2:2022cv00426 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Brett H Ludwig |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Marcus D Cannon. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (kah) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk on 4/11/22. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(jad) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 4/11/22 denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. The complaint is dismissed for frivolousness. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(jad)
|
| Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff requesting that the consent/refusal form to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph be filed within 21 days. (kah) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Marcus D Cannon. (kah) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Brett P Kaydo, Alice A Rudebush, Raymond Robert Rutz, III filed by Marcus D Cannon. Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(kah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
