Babler et al v. Soo Line Railroad Company
| Trisha Babler and David Babler |
| Soo Line Railroad Company |
| 2:2022cv00560 |
| May 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 REPLY filed by David Babler, Trisha Babler re #17 Response to Motion,,, filed by Defendant Soo Line Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Table of Authorities, #2 Exhibit A - Sprinkmann Website PO, #3 Exhibit B - T. Priebe Employment Card, #4 Exhibit C - Affidavit of T. Babler, #5 Exhibit D - Order Granting Sprinkmann MSJ)(Stern, Charles) Modified on 6/30/2022 (bx). |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion filed by Soo Line Railroad Company re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court . (Attachments: #1 Table of Authorities, #2 Exhibit A -Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Sprinkmann's Answers to RFP, #4 Exhibit C - Depo of Leo Puddy, #5 Exhibit D -Depo of Krebsbach, #6 Exhibit E- Depo of Hagen, #7 Exhibit F - Depo of Koepke, #8 Exhibit G - MV Release and Affidavit, #9 Exhibit H - Plaintiffs' Expert Reports, #10 Exhibit I - Depo of Fitzpatrick, #11 Exhibit J - Depo of Spear, #12 Exhibit K - Sprinkmann MSJ, #13 Exhibit L - Plaintiff's Response Sprinkmann, #14 Exhibit M - Affidavits of Co-workers, #15 Exhibit N - Chart Re Discovery, #16 Exhibit O - Soo Line Discovery, #17 Exhibit P - Email, #18 Exhibit Q - Order MTD, #19 Exhibit R - Depo of Pat Mooney, #20 Exhibit S - Scheduling Order)(Peters, Thomas) |
| Filing 16 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Plan and Status Update by David Babler, Trisha Babler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Case Management Order)(Stern, Charles) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles P Stern on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Attorney(s) appearing: Charles P. Stern (Stern, Charles) |
| Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Charles Stern . (Attachments: #1 Ex. T to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand)(Stachowiak, Keith) |
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Charles Stern . (Attachments: #1 Ex. P to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #2 Ex. Q to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #3 Ex. R to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #4 Ex. S to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #5 Ex. U to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #6 Ex. V to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #7 Ex. W to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #8 Ex. X to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #9 Ex. Y to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand)(Stachowiak, Keith) |
| Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Charles Stern . (Attachments: #1 Ex. A to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #2 Ex. B to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #3 Ex. C to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #4 Ex. D to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #5 Ex. E to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #6 Ex. F to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #7 Ex. G to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #8 Ex. H to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #9 Ex. I to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #10 Ex. J to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #11 Ex. K to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #12 Ex. L to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #13 Ex. M to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand, #14 Ex. N to Aff of Stern re Plf Motion to Remand)(Stachowiak, Keith) |
| Filing 11 ATTACHMENTS by All Plaintiffs re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court . (Stachowiak, Keith) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court by All Plaintiffs. (Stachowiak, Keith) |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE Statement by All Plaintiffs. (Stachowiak, Keith) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by All Plaintiffs. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Stachowiak, Keith) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Keith Stachowiak . (Attachments: #1 Application for Admission to Practice)(Stachowiak, Keith) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Melinda A Bialzik on behalf of Soo Line Railroad Company. Attorney(s) appearing: Melinda A. Bialzik (Bialzik, Melinda) |
Filing 5
PRETRIAL ORDER signed by Judge JP Stadtmueller on 5/25/2022. (cc: all counsel) (ld)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Soo Line Railroad Company. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (O'Connor, Emily) |
| Case reassigned to Judge J P Stadtmueller. Magistrate Judge William E Duffin no longer assigned to the case. (mlm) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Soo Line Railroad Company. (O'Connor, Emily) |
| Filing 2 LETTER to Kathryn Llaurado regarding Admission and ECF registration (sent via USPS) (jcl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Soo Line Railroad Company from Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Case Number: 2021cv395 with attached state court documents. (Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4113578) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Plf's Response to Sprinkmann's MSJ, #2 Exhibit B- Order Granting Sprinkmann's MSJ, #3 Exhibit C-Affidavit, #4 Complaint Exhibit D-Complaint, #5 Removal Notice Exhibit E - Notice of Removal State Court, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(O'Connor, Emily) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
