Puchner v. Maxwell et al
| John D Puchner |
| Mike Maxwell, Lisa Neubauer, Eric Severson, Brett Ludwig, Hon Pepper, Honorable Adelman and Hon Stadtmueller |
| 2:2024cv00478 |
| April 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SECOND EMERGENCY MOTION for Continuance and NOTICE of Change of Address by John D Puchner. Address updated to PO Box 216, Elm Grove, WI 53122. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice re Electronic Monitoring Program)(mew) |
| Filing 9 EMERGENCY MOTION for Continuance by John D Puchner. (mew) |
| Filing 8 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John D Puchner. Parties termed: Lisa Neubauer, Hon Pepper, Hon Stadtmueller, Honorable Adelman, and Brett Ludwig. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(mew) |
| Filing 7 ...(continued from ECF No 6 - Duplicate Document) RECOMMENDATION signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 5/3/2024 RECOMMENDING THAT Judges Pepper, Stadtmueller, Adelman, Ludwig, Neubauer, and Maxwell be dismissed as respondents in this action and that #3 MOTION to Stay filed by John D Puchner be denied. Any written objection to any order or recommendation herein or part thereof shall be filed within fourteen days of the date of service of this recommendation and order. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se Petitioner)(lz) |
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 5/3/2024 re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John D Puchner. Within 21 days Puchner shall show cause why sanctions should not be imposed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c) for having named as respondents "Bret [sic] Ludwid [sic]," "Hon. Pepper," "Hon. Adelman" and "Hon. J.P. Staadmudler [sic]." The Clerk shall randomly assign any subsequent habeas petition filed by Puchner without regard to whether any judge is named as a respondent. This action shall be randomly assigned to a district judge for review of this Recommendation and Order and consideration of what, if any, sanctions are appropriate for Puchner's apparent violation of Rule 11. (continued below)... (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se Petitioner)(lz)
|
| Case Reassigned to Judge J P Stadtmueller. Magistrate Judge William E Duffin no longer assigned to the case. (lz) |
| Filing 5 UPDATE Regarding Appeal by John D Puchner. (Attachments: #1 5/1/2024 WI Court of Appeals Order)(lz) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by John D Puchner. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lz) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Stay or Furlough by John D Puchner. (lz) |
| Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to Petitioner re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting payment of the full filing fee or that a petition to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee and six-month certified trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (lz) (Main Document 2 replaced on 4/22/2024) (lz). Modified on 4/22/2024 (lz). |
| FILING FEE Received: $5.00, receipt number 95323. (mew) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC Section 2241 filed by John D Puchner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits - bookmarked, #2 Cover page)(lz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
