Yang v. State of Wisconsin et al
Kay Xiong Yang |
State of Wisconsin, Does 1-100, James K Meuhlbauer, Kristian Lindo, Adam Y Gerol and Matthew Seipel |
2:2024cv01200 |
September 20, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Brett H Ludwig |
Other Statutory Actions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/15/24. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(jad) |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel B Peters on behalf of Adam Y Gerol, Kristian Lindo, James K Meuhlbauer, State of Wisconsin. Attorney(s) appearing: Daniel B. Peters (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Peters, Daniel) |
![]() |
Filing 3 EMERGENCY PETITION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Kay Xiong Yang. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(amb) |
Filing 2 PETITION for and NOTICE of Removal filed by Kay Xiong Yang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(amb) |
Filing 1 PRO SE EMERGENCY PETITION for Declaratory Judgment with Injunctive Relief against all respondents filed by Kay Xiong Yang. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries. (Filing Fee PAID - Receipt No. 96674) (Service Packet Issued) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits A-F, #3 Exhibit G, #4 Exhibits H-L, #5 Exhibits N-T)(amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.