Tokio Marine Highland Insurance Services Inc v. CD Smith Construction Inc
| Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company, Tokio Marine Highland Insurance Services Inc and WNC Insurance Services, Inc. as subrogee of Becher |
| CD Smith Construction Inc |
| 2:2024cv01462 |
| November 13, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Consolidate Cases by CD Smith Construction Inc. (Niemuth, Averi) |
| Filing 10 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by CD Smith Construction Inc. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Niemuth, Averi) |
| Filing 9 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by All Plaintiffs. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Carroll, Philip) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Levy on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Attorney(s) appearing: Jonathan Levy (Levy, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip T Carroll on behalf of Tokio Marine Highland Insurance Services Inc, Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company. Attorney(s) appearing: Philip T. Carroll (Carroll, Philip) |
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 11/21/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 2/24/2025 at 3:30 PM by telephone before Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. The parties are to appear by calling the court's conference line at 551-285-1373 and entering Meeting ID 161 4901 8989 and Passcode 190021 when prompted. Rule 26 discovery plan due by 2/10/2024 2/10/2025. (cc: all counsel)(cb) Modified on 11/21/2024 (Rule 26 discovery plan due date corrected) (cb).
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by CD Smith Construction Inc. (Smigelski, Brian) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by C.D. Smith Construction Inc Proof of Filing of Notice of Removal in State Court (Smigelski, Brian) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge William Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (mew) |
| Case Opening Modification(s); The following modification(s) have been made to your case entry: The county code has been modified - please remember to choose the county for the first named plaintiff. One or more party names have been modified - please remember to follow the Party Name Guidelines found on our website. ; Please refer to the # attorney case opening instructions, the # summons instructions and the # party name guidelines found in the user manual for further guidance (edr) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by C.D. Smith Construction, Inc.. (Smigelski, Brian) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian R Smigelski on behalf of C.D. Smith Construction, Inc.. Attorney(s) appearing: Brian R. Smigelski (Smigelski, Brian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by C.D. Smith Construction, Inc. from Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Case Number: 24cv8022 with attached state court documents. (Filing Fee PAID $405 receipt number AWIEDC-4817568) (Attachments: #1 Complaint Summons and Complaint from State Court, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Smigelski, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
