Neugebauer v. Shield Protective Services LLC et al
| Gregory Neugebauer |
| Shield Protective Services LLC and Christopher Schmaling |
| 2:2025cv00553 |
| April 17, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Connor J Clegg on behalf of Gregory Neugebauer. Attorney(s) appearing: Connor J. Clegg (Clegg, Connor) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Gregory Neugebauer. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Johnson, Larry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Gregory Neugebauer. ( Filing Fee PAID $405 receipt number AWIEDC-4931731) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent for Gregory Neugebauer, #2 Summons Summons for Shield Protective Services, LLC, #3 Summons Summons for Christopher Schmaling, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Larry) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
