Williams, Roosevelt v. Anderson, Trish et al
| Roosevelt M. Williams |
| Trish Anderson, Shane Zahrte and Lucas Wogernese |
| 3:2017cv00304 |
| April 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing the case. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying plaintiff Roosevelt M. Williams's 17 motion regarding the denial of legal loans. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/29/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed against defendants Shane Zahrte, Trish Anderson, and Lucas Wogernese. A determination on plaintiff's state law claims is STAYED pending plaintiff showing the court that he has complied with Wis. Stat. § 893.82. Plaintiff may have until August 21, 2017 to inform the court whether he has complied with this statute. If plaintiff does not respond by this deadline, I will dismiss his state law claims. Service of the complaint is STAYED pending resolution of the notice-of-claim issue. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/1/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Roosevelt Williams assessed an initial partial filing fee of $4.76 due 5/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 4/21/2017. (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
