Fujitsu Limited et al v. Netgear, Inc.
Fujitsu Limited, LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and U.S. Philips Corporation |
Netgear, Inc. |
3:2007cv00710 |
December 17, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Out of Country |
Barbara B Crabb |
Stephen L Crocker |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 575 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 443 Motion to Strike ; granting in part and denying in part 467 Motion to Strike ; granting in part and denying in part 485 Motion to Strike ; granting 503 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 504 Motion for Leave to File ; granting 508 Motion to Strike. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/28/09. (rep) |
Filing 309 ORDER granting as modified 232 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiffs Fujitsu Limited, LG Electronics Inc. and U.S. Philips Corporation awarded attorney fees in the amount of $30,000.00. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B Crabb on 1/29/09. (rep) |
Filing 302 ORDER denying 284 Motion to exclude improperly disclosed opinions. Deft. granted until 2/2/09 to submit an expert report response to the only the doctrine of equivalence opinions. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B Crabb on 1/8/09. (rep) Modified text on 1/9/2009 to correct date to submit expert report from 2/9/09 to 2/2/09. (llj) |
Filing 301 ORDER granting 227 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B Crabb on 1/5/09. (rep) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.