Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO et al v. Walker, Scott et al
| Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO, AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO and Jamie O'Brien |
| Scott Walker, James R. Scott, Judith Neumann and Rodney G. Pasch |
| 3:2011cv00462 |
| June 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants Judith Neumann, Rodney G. Pasch, James R. Scott and Scott Walker dismissing the case. ( PAO). Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 9/13/2013. (voc)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER denying 14 Motion to Intervene by Intervenor Defendants; Granting 26 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief by defendant City of Madison; Granting 27 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Granting 43 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief by Intervenor Defendants; Denying as moot 46 Motion for Reconsideration by plaintiffs; Denying as moot 60 Motion for Status Conference by plaintiffs. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 9/11/2013. (voc)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Denying 39 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court by Plaintiffs AFSCME Local 60, AFL-CIO, Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO and Jamie O'Brien. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/8/2012. (voc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
