Bryant, Thomas et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
Thomas Bryant and State of Wisconsin - Department of Health Services |
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and Group Health Cooperative of Eau Claire |
3:2012cv00593 |
August 16, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Dane |
William M. Conley |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER that this case is remanded to the Circuit Court for Dane County, Wisconsin for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/27/2012. (voc) |
Filing 18 ORDER that defendants Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation or any other party who wants this case to proceed in federal court may have until November 26, 2012, to show cause why this case should not be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Any party who wishes to respond may have until December 3, 2012, to do so. If no party responds to this order by November 26, I will remand the case to state court. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/16/2012. (voc) |
Filing 11 ORDER of Recusal. District Judge William M. Conley recused. Case reassigned to District Judge Barbara B. Crabb for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 9/18/2012. (lak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.