Puent, Frederick v. Croell Redi-Mix, Inc. et al
| Frederick A. Puent |
| Croell Redi-Mix, Inc., Dan Vandoorhees and Bill Wedephal |
| 3:2013cv00052 |
| January 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Monroe |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER that plaintiff Frederick A. Puent is GRANTED leave to proceed on his ADEA and ADA discrimination claims against defendant Croell Redi-Mix, Inc.; plaintiff is denied leave to proceed on all claims against defendants Dan Vandoorhees and Bill Wede phal and both are dismissed from this action; plaintiff's retaliation claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for his failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8; plaintiff may have until March 17, 2014, in which to file an amended complaint that complies with this Opinion and Order; and if plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by that date, the court will dismiss his retaliation claims. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/14/2014. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/4/2013. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
