Pidgeon, Curtis v. Tegels, Lizzie
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 2, 2014
JUDGMENT entered granting the petition of Curtis Pidgeon for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is to be released within 60 days of the issuance of this court's mandate unless the state advises the court before then that it intends to provide petitioner a prompt trial. (BBC/PAO). (jef),(ps)
|August 29, 2014
ORDER granting 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is to be released within 60 days of the issuance of this court's mandate unless the state advises the court before then that it intends to provide petitioner a prompt trial. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/29/2014. (jef),(ps)
|January 23, 2014
ORDER that not later than April 11, 2014, each side must file a pre-hearing brief with the court previewing what the court should expect at the evidentiary hearing. Not later than April 18, 2014, each side may file a response to its opponent's first brief. The court shall hold an evidentiary hearing on April 25, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 1/22/2014. (jef),(ps)
|December 13, 2013
ORDER that petitioner Curtis Pidgeon may have until December 30, 2013 to submit a six-month trust fund account statement so that the court may assess his financial eligibility for appointment of counsel. The court will schedule a prompt evidentiary hearing following resolution of petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 12/13/2013. (jef),(ps)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?