Cheek, Joshua v. Beeman, Jen et al
Joshua J. Cheek |
Mendota Hospital, Jen Beeman, Clair Kruger, Sara Conklin, Greg Vanrivbreck and Heather |
3:2013cv00527 |
July 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Dane |
Barbara B. Crabb |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 77 ORDER granting defendant Jan Beeman's 61 Motion for Summary Judgment on plaintiff's medical care claim; denying 72 Motion to for leave to file sur-reply. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/6/2014. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 76 ORDER denying defendant Jen Beeman's 30 Motion for partial summary judgment on her assertion that plaintiff's claim against her is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). The pretrial conference order, dkt. # 23 , is AMENDED to permit each side to file only one more dispositive motion in this lawsuit. The dispositive motion deadline of September 15, 2014 remains in place. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/16/2014. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 52 ORDER denying plaintiff's 46 motion for reconsideration denying him leave to amend his complaint; denying 51 motion for preliminary injunction. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 4/15/2014. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 45 ORDER denying defendant Jen Beeman's 43 motion to reconsider the court's March 27, 2014 order allowing plaintiff Joshua Cheek to proceed on his denial of medical care claim. Defendant is GRANTED leave to amend her motion for summary judg ment, dkt. # 30 , to include plaintiff's battery claim. Plaintiff may have until April 16, 2014 to file his brief in response to defendant's motion for summary judgment. Defendant may have until April 28, 2014 to file her brief in reply. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 4/2/2014. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 42 ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's 37 motion to reconsider his request to amend his complaint. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed on his claims for excessive force and denial of access to medical care under the Eighth or the Fourteenth Amendment and on his state law battery claim against defendant Jen Beeman. He is DENIED leave to proceed on his denial of access to the courts claim against members of the Mendota Mental Health Institute staff. Defendant is to advise the court no later than April 2, 2014 whether she wishes to amend her motion for summary judgment. Briefing on defendant's summary judgment motion, dkt. # 30 , is STAYED until after April 2. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/27/2014. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 6 ORDER that plaintiff's request to waive his initial partial filing fee, dkt. 5 , is DENIED. Plaintiff may have an enlargement of time to September 16, 2013, in which to submit a check or money order made payable to the clerk of court in the amo unt of $5.07. If, by September 16, 2013, plaintiff fails to make the initial partial payment, the clerk is directed to close this file without prejudice to plaintiff's filing his case at a later date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 8/8/2013. (jef/cc: to plaintiff at both Mendota and D.C.I),(ps) |
Filing 4 ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 5.07 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 8/15/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 7/26/2013. (jef),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.