Memon, Iftikhar v. Waukesha County Technical College
Plaintiff: Iftikhar Ahmed Memon
Defendant: Waukesha County Technical College
Case Number: 3:2013cv00704
Filed: October 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Barbara B. Crabb
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 96 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendant Waukesha County Technical College dismissing this case. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
February 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER granting in part 50 Motion to Compel; denying 51 Motion to consider to shut down Waukesha County Technical College for good; denying 60 Motion for Summary Judgment. The compelled responses are to be provided to plaintiff by February 20, 2015. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 2/6/2015. (jef),(ps)
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER denying defendant's 22 motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/27/2014. (jef),(ps)
April 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting Defendant Waukesha County Technical College's 8 motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claims related to the June 2012 and September 2012 applications for employment. Plaintiff's 19 amended complaint is the operative pleading in this case. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 4/10/2014. (jef),(ps)
March 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER that defendant Waukesha County Technical College's motion to dismiss, dkt. # 8 , plaintiff's complaint is on the ground it violates Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 is GRANTED. Plaintiff may have until April 10, 2013, to submit a proposed amended c omplaint that conforms to the requirements of Rule 8. If plaintiff fails to respond to this order by that date, the clerk of court is directed to close this case. Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims related to the June 2012 and September 2012 applications for employment is CONVERTED to a motion for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(d). Plaintiff may have until April 10, 2013, to show cause why the court should not dismiss these claims for failure to satisfy the procedural requirements identified in this opinion. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/21/2014. (jef),(ps)
October 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis. Full filing fee required. ( Fee due 10/30/2013.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/9/2013. (jef),(ps)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Memon, Iftikhar v. Waukesha County Technical College
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Iftikhar Ahmed Memon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Waukesha County Technical College
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?