Lancour, Shane v. City of LaCrosse PD et al
Shane T. Lancour |
City of LaCrosse PD, LaCrosse Police Department, Heath Parshall, Jason Nesbit and Tony DeLap |
3:2015cv00105 |
February 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
La Crosse |
William M. Conley |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 ORDER that the clerk's office enter Katelynn Williams and William Parsonsof the law firm of Hawks Quindel as plaintiff's pro bono counsel of record and to set this case for a status conference in July 2017, as the court's schedule allows. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 6/29/2017. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 66 ORDER denying 31 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 40 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel. The proceedings in this case are STAYED pending recruitment of counsel for plaintiff. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 5/18/2017. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 14 ORDER Amending first paragraph on page 3 of 12 Order on Leave to Proceed. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/21/2015. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing plaintiff Shane T. Lancour's complaint, without prejudice, for want of prosecution. (PAO/nln). (nln),(ps) |
Filing 3 ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 3/4/2015. (jef),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.