Sierra-Lopez, Kevin et al v. Lamarca, Michael et al
Plaintiff: |
Kevin Sierra-Lopez |
Defendant: |
Michael Lamarca, Barb, Miller, Denise Valerious, Mary Mashak, Michael Dittman, Syed, Jolinda Waterman, R. Feldman and S. McArdle |
Case Number: |
3:2017cv00599 |
Filed: |
August 2, 2017 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Office: |
Madison Office |
County: |
Grant |
Presiding Judge: |
William M. Conley |
Presiding Judge: |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 17, 2023 |
Filing
243
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 231 Motion in Limine; denying 237 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/17/2023. (jef)
|
July 21, 2023 |
Filing
230
ORDER granting 215 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part 217 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/21/2023. (jef)
|
July 13, 2022 |
Filing
204
ORDER granting 192 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint; Granting 197 Motion for Screening of Complaint; Granting 203 Renewed Motion for Screening Order and Request for Reinstatement of Discovery Deadlines and Docket. Plaintiff is GRAN TED leave to proceed on claims against defendants Salam Syed, Mary Mashak and Jolinda Waterman under the Eighth Amendment and state law. Plaintiff is also GRANTED leave to proceed on an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Rebecca Tracy. . Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/13/2022. (voc)
|
August 17, 2020 |
Filing
189
ORDER that the clerk's office enter Lonnie Story of the Story Law Firm as plaintiff's pro bono counsel of record and to set this case for a status conference in mid-September as the court's schedule allows. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/17/2020. (rks),(ps)
|
July 1, 2020 |
Filing
186
ORDER that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (dkt. # 137 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to plaintiff's deliberate indifference claims against defendants Michael Lamarca, Jasen Miller, Denise Valerius and Lori Alsum. At the close of this case, the clerk's office is directed to enter judgment in these defendants' favor. The court declines to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state-law medical malpractice cla im against Lamarca, and will dismiss that claim without prejudice. The motion is DENIED as to plaintiff's claims against defendants Salam Syed and Jolinda Waterman. Defendant Sandra McArdle's motion for summary judgment (dkt. # 146 ) i s also GRANTED. At the close of this case, the clerk's office is directed to enter judgment in defendant McArdle's favor as well. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Barb or Barbara Harris a/k/a Nurse are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUD ICE, and the clerk's office is directed to terminate her as a party. Defendant Rebecca Tracy's deadline for filing a dispositive motion deadline is August 3, 2020.Plaintiff's renewed motion for assistance in recruiting counsel ( dkt. # 178 ) is GRANTED. Defendant Sandra McArdle's motion to stay (dkt. # 182 ) and defendant Rebecca Tracy's motion to joint McArdle's motion to stay (dkt. # 184 ) are both DENIED AS MOOT. All pretrial deadlines and the trial date are STRUCK. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/1/2020. (jef),(ps)
|
February 28, 2020 |
Filing
152
ORDER that Plaintiff Kevin Sierra-Lopez's motion for the court to accept plaintiff's previous e-filings (dkt. # 77 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery (dkt. # 78 ) is DENIED. Defendant Sandra McArdle' s motion for summary judgment on exhaustion grounds (dkt. # 80 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (dkt. # 85 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to clarify and correct the record as to defendant Barb (or Barbara) Harris a/k/a Nurse Barb (dkt. # 87 ) is GRANTED AS PROVIDED WITHIN THIS ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions against defendant Waterman (dkt. # 88 ) is DENIED. Defendant McArdle's motion for sanctions (dkt. #92) is DENIED. Defendant L ori Alsum's motion for leave and motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies (dkt. # 111 ) is WITHDRAWN in light of dkt. # 123 . Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss defendant Alsum (dkt. #117) is WIT HDRAWN in light of dkt. # 119 . Defendant McArdle's motion for leave to file a reply brief in support of motion for sanctions (dkt. # 120 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for assistance in recruiting pro bono counsel (dkt. # 126 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/28/2020. (jef),(ps)
|
April 3, 2019 |
Filing
33
ORDER that if plaintiff Kevin Sierra-Lopez seeks to pursue his request for a preliminary injunction, his proposed findings of fact are due on or before April 24, 2019. If he fails to submit these factual findings, the court will deny his motions for preliminary injunction as moot and set this matter over for a preliminary pretrial scheduling conference. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/3/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
August 9, 2017 |
Filing
6
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Kevin Sierra-Lopez assessed an initial partial filing fee of $2.22 due 8/31/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 8/9/2017. (nln),(ps)
|
August 2, 2017 |
Filing
2
ORDER that Plaintiff Kevin Sierra-Lopez submit $400 filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with Trust Fund Account Statement by 8/24/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 8/2/2017. (nln),(ps)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?