Miner, Kathryn v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
| Kathryn Miner |
| State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Jon Litscher, Jim Schwochert, Mark L. Welsgerber, Scott Eckstein, Steve Schueler and John Kind |
| 3:2017cv00734 |
| September 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Racine |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT entered in favor defendants dismissing this case with prejudice. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 2/14/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER that plaintiff Kathryn Miner may have until January 18, 2019 to file a response to defendants' motion for summary judgment. If plaintiff does not respond by that date, I will dismiss this case with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 for plaintiff's failure to prosecute it. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 01/11/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying plaintiff Kathryn Miner's 14 Motion to Compel. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 1/2/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Kathryn Miner's 3 , 7 motions for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees are GRANTED. Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/5/2017. (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
