Acosta, Reinaldo v. Maki et al
Reinaldo C. Acosta, Jr. |
John/Jane Doe, Sgt. Maki, Lt. Trochinski and Dave Tarr |
3:2018cv00726 |
August 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Prisoner (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER dismissing #1 Complaint. Amended complaint due 11/2/2018. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/16/2018. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 4 Initial Order for Paid Pro Se: Plaintiff complaint taken under advisement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/10/2018. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 3 Letter regarding filing fee from plaintiff Reinaldo Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Letter to business office, envelope, #2 Envelope) (jef),(ps) |
PRLA Screening of Complaint. (jef),(ps) |
Disregard. (jef). |
Filing fee received: $ 400, receipt number 34690032963. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 2 ORDER directing plaintiff to submit $400 filing fee or a motion for ifp and a Trust Fund Account Statement by 9/21/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 8/31/2018. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Reinaldo C. Acosta, Jr. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (jef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.