CURT Manufacturing, LLC v. Partshawk, LLC et al
CURT Manufacturing, LLC |
Does 1 - 100, Partshawk, LLC, Michael S. Perrin and Terry Perrin |
3:2018cv01054 |
December 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Action Requested: Counsel for plaintiff requested to promptly file proof of service. (jls) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Partshawk, LLC, Michael S. Perrin, and Terry Perrin. (jls) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff CURT Manufacturing, LLC. (Maher, Ann) |
Filing 1 TRADEMARK COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2379180.) filed by CURT Manufacturing, LLC, (Attachments: #1 Summons to Partshawk, LLC, #2 Summons to Terry Perrin, #3 Summons to Michael S. Perrin, #4 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Maher, Ann) Modified on 12/19/2018: Changed Cause of Action. Was blank on the Civil Cover Sheet. Changed to match the complaint. (lak) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (jls) |
Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (jls) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.