Sheikh, Maeraj v. Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc.
Maeraj Sheikh |
Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. |
3:2019cv00089 |
February 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Notice to Counsel: The Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 4/30/2019 is canceled in light of the settlement agreement. (kwf) |
Filing 10 Notice of Settlement by Plaintiff Maeraj Sheikh. (DeLadurantey, Nathan) |
Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 4/30/2019 at 1:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (kwf) |
Filing 9 ANSWER by Defendant Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 8 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #6 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings. Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. answer due 3/26/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 3/5/2019. (arw) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 6 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings by Defendant Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Morgan Ian Marcus for Defendant Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Andrew Edward Cunningham for Defendant Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (Cunningham, Andrew) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (kwf) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf) |
Standard attachments for District Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kwf) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Maeraj Sheikh. (DeLadurantey, Nathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc., ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2403867.), filed by Maeraj Sheikh, (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (DeLadurantey, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sheikh, Maeraj v. Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Morgan Ian Marcus |
Represented By: | Andrew Edward Cunningham |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Maeraj Sheikh | |
Represented By: | Nathan Edward DeLadurantey |
Represented By: | Zeshan Usman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.