Sheikh, Maeraj v. Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Maeraj Sheikh
Defendant: Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv00089
Filed: February 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William M Conley
Referring Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2019 Notice to Counsel: The Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 4/30/2019 is canceled in light of the settlement agreement. (kwf)
March 27, 2019 Filing 10 Notice of Settlement by Plaintiff Maeraj Sheikh. (DeLadurantey, Nathan)
March 27, 2019 Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 4/30/2019 at 1:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (kwf)
March 26, 2019 Filing 9 ANSWER by Defendant Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (Marcus, Morgan)
March 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #6 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings. Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. answer due 3/26/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 3/5/2019. (arw)
March 4, 2019 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (Marcus, Morgan)
March 4, 2019 Filing 6 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings by Defendant Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (Marcus, Morgan)
March 4, 2019 Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Morgan Ian Marcus for Defendant Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (Marcus, Morgan)
March 4, 2019 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Andrew Edward Cunningham for Defendant Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (Cunningham, Andrew)
February 6, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc. (kwf)
February 6, 2019 Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf)
February 6, 2019 Standard attachments for District Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kwf)
February 5, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Maeraj Sheikh. (DeLadurantey, Nathan)
February 5, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc., ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2403867.), filed by Maeraj Sheikh, (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (DeLadurantey, Nathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sheikh, Maeraj v. Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc.
Represented By: Morgan Ian Marcus
Represented By: Andrew Edward Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maeraj Sheikh
Represented By: Nathan Edward DeLadurantey
Represented By: Zeshan Usman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?