Clark, Noah v. Reinikain, Kevin et al
| Noah Dabe Clark |
| Officer Kevin Reinikain and Mulitple Unknown Rice Lake Police Officers/Deputys |
| 3:2019cv00140 |
| February 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 3/12/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
| Filing 5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Noah Dabe Clark. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 4 Letter from clerk's office to plaintiff regarding the court does not accept filings via facsimile. (rks),(ps) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Noah Dabe Clark may have until 3/13/2019 to file an amended Financial Affidavit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 02/20/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Noah Dabe Clark. (rks),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mulitple Unknown Rice Lake Police Officers/Deputys, Kevin Reinikain, filed by Noah Dabe Clark. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Fax Coversheet) (rks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
