Doughty, Matthew v. Grossman, Thomas et al
Matthew Doughty |
Agnesian Health Care, Waupun Memorial Hospital and Dr. Thomas Grossman |
3:2019cv00529 |
June 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Warden PLRA Letter. (rks),(ps) |
Partial Filing fee received : $241.61, receipt number 34690034934. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 5 ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 241.61 assessed due by 7/25/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 7/2/2019. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Matthew Doughty. (Attachments: #1 IPP Calculation) (rks),(ps) |
Filing 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Matthew Doughty. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (rks),(ps) |
Filing 2 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel by Plaintiff Matthew Doughty. (Attachments: #1 Letters from Bremer & Trollop Law Office, S.C., Foley & Lardner LLP, and Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Steward, P.C.) (rks),(ps) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Matthew Doughty. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (rks),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.