Vent, Mary et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
| Brian Vent and Mary Elizabeth Vent |
| C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00619 |
| July 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this case is closed without further order of the court. (voc) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice. (Faught, Catherine) |
| Filing 11 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. served on 8/14/2019, answer due 9/4/2019. (Trecek, Timothy) |
| Filing 10 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. C.R. Bard, Inc. served on 8/22/2019, answer due 9/12/2019. (Trecek, Timothy) |
| Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 9/26/2019 at 1:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (lak) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (Faught, Catherine) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc. (Faught, Catherine) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. (Faught, Catherine) |
Filing 6
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **Plaintiffs have filed an amended complaint (dkt. #4 ) as directed by the court to include additional allegations regarding subject matter jurisdiction. The court is persuaded that plaintiffs have now adequately alleged at the pleading stage that there is complete diversity of citizenship between plaintiffs and defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., and the amount in controversy is greater than $75,000, so the court may exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/7/2019. (kwf)
|
| Filing 5 Amended Summons Issued as to C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (kwf) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., filed by Mary Elizabeth Vent, Brian Vent, (Attachments: #1 Amended Summons - C.R. Bard, Inc., #2 Amended Summons - Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.) (Trecek, Timothy) Modified on 8/7/2019. (lak) |
|
Filing 3
OPINION AND ORDER Regarding Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/5/2019. (DPM)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (kwf) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf) |
| Standard attachments for District Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kwf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2511501.), filed by Mary Elizabeth Vent, Brian Vent, (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - C.R. Bard, Inc., #3 Summons - Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.) (Trecek, Timothy) Modified on 7/30/2019: The complaint and summonses are missing the case number. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
