Staples, Paul v. Saul, Andrew
| Paul D. Staples |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| 3:2019cv00925 |
| November 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Peter A Oppeneer |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Summons Returned Executed by Defendant Andrew M. Saul, (Attachments: #1 Service Receipt - Attorney General) (Daley, Frederick) |
| Filing 8 Summons Returned Executed by Defendant Andrew M. Saul, (Attachments: #1 Service Receipt - Commissioner) (Daley, Frederick) |
| Filing 7 Summons Returned Executed by Defendant Andrew M. Saul. Andrew M. Saul served on 12/9/2019, answer due 2/7/2020. (Attachments: #1 Service Receipt - U.S. Attorney) (Daley, Frederick) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul. Materials returned to plaintiff counsel for service. (rks) |
Filing 5
** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** From the affidavit of indigency plaintiff has submitted, I find that plaintiff is unable to prepay the fees and costs of commencing this action or to give security therefor. Accordingly, plaintiff's petition for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee is granted. The clerk of court shall issue summonses and forward them to plaintiff's counsel for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 11/15/2019. (rks)
|
| Standard attachments for Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: #Corporate Disclosure Statement, #Order Regarding Assignment of Cases, #Notice of Assignment to a Magistrate Judge and Consent/Request for Reassignment, #Order on Dispositive Motions. (rks) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker and Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer. (rks) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Meredith Emily Marcus for Plaintiff Paul D. Staples. (Marcus, Meredith) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Frederick J. Daley, Jr for Plaintiff Paul D. Staples. (Daley, Frederick) |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Paul D. Staples. (Daley, Frederick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Paul D. Staples, (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summonses Combined) (Daley, Frederick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Staples, Paul v. Saul, Andrew | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
| Represented By: | Albert Bianchi, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Commissioner of Social Security |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul D. Staples | |
| Represented By: | Meredith Emily Marcus |
| Represented By: | Frederick J. Daley, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
