Bolton-Skogen, Stephanie et al v. SharkNinja Operating LLC
| Quartz Health Benefit Plans Corporation, Stephanie M Bolton-Skogen and Stephanie M. Bolton-Skogen |
| SharkNinja Operating LLC |
| 3:2019cv00948 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** As directed by the court, defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC has filed an amended notice of removal to include additional allegations regarding subject matter jurisdiction. The court is persuaded that defendant has now adequately alleged at the pleading stage that there is complete diversity of citizenship between plaintiff and defendant and the amount in controversy is greater than $75,000, so the court may exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/7/2020. (kwf)
|
| Filing 10 Amended Notice of Removal by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC. (Bullard, Jennifer) Modified on 1/6/2020. (lak) |
|
Filing 9
OPINION AND ORDER Regarding Jurisdiction. Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC shall have until January 8, 2020, to file and serve an amended notice of removal containing good faith allegations sufficient to establish complete diversity of citizenship for purposes of determining subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 12/18/2019. (kwf)
|
| Case randomly reassigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC. (Bullard, Jennifer) |
| Action Requested: If you have not already provided your #Consent to Magistrate/Request for Reassignment form, please do so by 12/17/2019. (lak) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC. (Bullard, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 Brief in Support of #5 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC. (Bullard, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS (Partial) by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC. Brief in Opposition due 12/16/2019. Brief in Reply due 12/26/2019. (Bullard, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC. (Bullard, Jennifer) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf) |
| Standard attachments for Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: #Corporate Disclosure Statement, #Order Regarding Assignment of Cases, #Notice of Assignment to a Magistrate Judge and Consent/Request for Reassignment, #Order on Dispositive Motions. (kwf) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Service by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC as to #1 Notice of Removal. (Bullard, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 Notice by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC re: #1 Notice of Removal. Civil Cover Sheet. (Bullard, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from La Crosse County Wisconsin Circuit Court, case number 2019-cv-000557, ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2579558), filed by SharkNinja Operating LLC, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Service of Process Transmittal) (Bullard, Jennifer) Modified on 11/18/2019: E-mail sent to counsel. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
