Jaeckle Wholesale, Inc. v. Mannington Mills Inc.
| Jaeckle Wholesale, Inc. |
| Mannington Mills Inc. |
| 3:2019cv01025 |
| December 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #9 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 1/31/2020. (rks)
|
| Filing 9 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by Defendant Mannington Mills Inc., (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Bosack, Sean) Modified on 1/31/2020. (lak) |
|
Filing 8
** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** ORDER accepting #7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Answer due 1/31/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 01/14/2020. (rks)
|
| Filing 7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Defendant Mannington Mills Inc., (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Bosack, Sean) Modified on 1/13/2020. (lak) |
| Filing 6 Record from Dane County. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 State Court Documents - Notice of Removal, Summons and Complaint, etc.) (rks) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Mannington Mills Inc. (Bosack, Sean) |
| Filing 4 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Mannington Mills Inc. served on 12/16/2019, answer due 1/6/2020. (Mandell, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Jaeckle Wholesale, Inc. (Mandell, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Mannington Mills Inc. Civil Cover Sheet. (Bosack, Sean) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (rks) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (rks) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Dane County Circuit Court, case number 2019CV003435. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2594680), filed by Mannington Mills Inc., (Attachments: #1 Dane County Summons and Complaint with Attachments, #2 Exhibit 1 - Dane County Pleadings) (Bosack, Sean) Modified on 12/17/2019. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jaeckle Wholesale, Inc. v. Mannington Mills Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jaeckle Wholesale, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Adam Mandell |
| Represented By: | Kurt Simatic |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mannington Mills Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Sean O'Donnell Bosack |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
