Osicka, Tim v. Office of Lawyer Regulation
Office of Lawyer Regulation |
Tim Osicka |
3:2020cv00478 |
May 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 Notice of Appeal from Bankruptcy Court. Bankruptcy Court case number 19-00083. Filed by Tim Osicka. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Order, #3 Docket Sheet) (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Osicka, Tim v. Office of Lawyer Regulation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: Office of Lawyer Regulation | |
Represented By: | Michael David Morris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: Tim Osicka | |
Represented By: | George Burnett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.