Inspire Licensing LLC v. Progress Software Corporation
Inspire Licensing LLC |
Progress Software Corporation |
3:2020cv00900 |
September 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer by Plaintiff Inspire Licensing LLC. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 10 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Progress Software Corporation answer due 12/1/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/29/2020. (kwf) |
Filing 9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Complaint, by Plaintiff Inspire Licensing LLC. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 8 Report on Filing of Patent or Trademark Action. Copy provided to the US Patent and Trademark Office electronically. (kwf) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Progress Software Corporation. (kwf) |
Filing 6 Exhibit to #5 Complaint, filed by Inspire Licensing LLC Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Standard attachments for District Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kwf) |
Action Requested: Counsel for plaintiff shall prepare and file a #Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark at their earliest convenience. (lak) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Progress Software Corporation. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2756455.), filed by Inspire Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Patent 10,005,427, #2 Exhibit 2 - Patent 9,764,712, #3 Exhibit 3 - Claim Charts, #4 Exhibit 4 - Claim Charts, #5 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons by Plaintiff Inspire Licensing LLC. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Inspire Licensing LLC. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Isaac Rabicoff for Plaintiff Inspire Licensing LLC. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 1 Disregard. Modified on 9/29/2020. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Inspire Licensing LLC v. Progress Software Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Inspire Licensing LLC | |
Represented By: | Isaac Rabicoff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.