DatRec, LLC v. Epic Systems Corporation
| DatRec, LLC |
| Epic Systems Corporation |
| 3:2021cv00257 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Telephone Pretrial or Status Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 7/20/2021 at 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (jls) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM against DatRec, LLC by Defendant Epic Systems Corporation. (Noel, Kristin) Modified on 6/10/2021. (lak) |
| Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS by Defendant Epic Systems Corporation. Brief in Opposition due 6/30/2021. Brief in Reply due 7/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - Litigation Chart) (Noel, Kristin) |
| Filing 14 Summons Returned Executed. Epic Systems Corporation served on 4/20/2021. (Coley, Sherry) Modified on 5/10/2021. (lak) |
Filing 13
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #10 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Epic Systems Corporation answer due 6/10/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/5/2021. (arw)
|
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance filed by Anita Marie Boor for Defendant Epic Systems Corporation. (Boor, Anita) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Epic Systems Corporation. (Snyder, Martha) |
| Filing 10 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Epic Systems Corporation. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Snyder, Martha) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Martha Jahn Snyder for Defendant Epic Systems Corporation. (Snyder, Martha) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Kristin Graham Noel for Defendant Epic Systems Corporation. (Noel, Kristin) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff DatRec, LLC. (Coley, Sherry) |
|
Filing 6
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #4 Motion to Admit William P. Ramey, III Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 4/21/2021. (lak)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Tiffany Woelfel for Plaintiff DatRec, LLC. (Woelfel, Tiffany) |
| Filing 4 Motion to Admit William P Ramey, III Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2862332.) by Plaintiff DatRec, LLC. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 3 Report on Filing of Patent or Trademark Action. Copy provided to the US Patent and Trademark Office electronically. (arw) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Epic Systems Corporation. (arw) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (arw) |
| Standard attachments for District Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (arw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Epic Systems Corporation, (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0758-2860798) filed by DatRec, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - '158 Patent, #2 Exhibit B - '309 Patent, #3 Summons Epic Systems Corporation, #4 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Report on Filing Patent/Trademark Action) (Coley, Sherry) Modified on 4/19/2021. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
