Haas, Sarah v. Easy Cash ASAP, LLC, et al
Plaintiff: Sarah Haas
Defendant: Easy Cash ASAP, LLC, d/b/a Easy Cash, Clarity Services, Inc. and Easy Cash ASAP, LLC doing business as Easy Cash
Case Number: 3:2021cv00680
Filed: October 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Referring Judge: James D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Pretrial Conference Order - # Preliminary Pretrial Packet in cases assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson attached. Dispositive Motions due 12/16/2022. Settlement Letters due 4/14/2023. Motions in Limine due 4/21/2023. Responses due 5/5/2023. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/17/2023 at 4:00 PM. Jury Selection and Trial set for 5/22/2023 at 9:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 12/20/2021. (kwf)
December 20, 2021 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker: Telephone Preliminary Pretrial Conference held on 12/16/2021 [:15] (cak)
December 15, 2021 Filing 12 Brief in Support of #11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings by Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. (Salman, Tanya)
December 15, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS by Defendant Clarity Services, Inc.. Brief in Opposition due 1/5/2022. Brief in Reply due 1/15/2022. (Salman, Tanya)
December 15, 2021 Filing 10 Notice of Appearance filed by Thomas John Lyons, Jr for Plaintiff Sarah Haas. (Lyons, Thomas)
December 13, 2021 Filing 9 Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Report by Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. (Salman, Tanya)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #6 Motion to Admit Kyle James Maury Pro Hac Vice; granting #7 Motion to Admit Benjamin N. Hutnick Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 11/19/2021. (lak)
November 19, 2021 Filing 7 Motion to Admit Benjamin N. Hutnick Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2968212.) by Defendant Easy Cash ASAP, LLC. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing) (Hutnick, Benjamin) Modified on 11/19/2021: E-mail sent to counsel. (lak)
November 19, 2021 Filing 6 Motion to Admit Kyle James Maury Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2967863.) by Defendant Clarity Services, Inc.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Maury, Kyle)
November 4, 2021 Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 12/16/2021 at 1:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (kwf)
November 3, 2021 Filing 5 ANSWER by Defendant Clarity Services, Inc.. (Salman, Tanya)
November 3, 2021 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Easy Cash ASAP, LLC. (Poncin, Michael)
November 3, 2021 Filing 3 ANSWER by Defendant Easy Cash ASAP, LLC. (Poncin, Michael)
October 29, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Clarity Services, Inc.. (Salman, Tanya)
October 28, 2021 Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Related to 21-cv-648-jdp. (voc)
October 28, 2021 Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (voc)
October 27, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Saint Croix County Circuit Court, case number 2021CV000352. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-2956559), filed by Clarity Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Salman, Tanya) Modified on 10/28/2021 (voc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haas, Sarah v. Easy Cash ASAP, LLC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Haas
Represented By: Eric Leighton Crandall
Represented By: Thomas John Lyons, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Easy Cash ASAP, LLC, d/b/a Easy Cash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clarity Services, Inc.
Represented By: Tanya Mutasim Salman
Represented By: Kyle James Maury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Easy Cash ASAP, LLC doing business as Easy Cash
Represented By: Benjamin N. Hutnick
Represented By: Michael S. Poncin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?