Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. Best4YourPets et al
| Quincy Bioscience, LLC |
| Best4YourPets and Does 1-10 |
| 3:2021cv00785 |
| December 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Action Requested: Counsel for plaintiff requested to promptly file proof of service. (rks) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Best4YourPets. (rks) |
| Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (rks) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (rks) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons by Plaintiff Quincy Bioscience, LLC. (Karnik, Sanjay) |
| Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Complaint, filed by Quincy Bioscience, LLC JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet (Karnik, Sanjay) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for False Advertising, Trademark Infringement, and Related Claims against All Defendants. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-2977566.), filed by Quincy Bioscience, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - PREVAGEN Trademark Registration) (Karnik, Sanjay) Modified on 12/10/2021. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
