Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. Retail Hunter LLC et al
| Quincy Bioscience, LLC |
| Retail Hunter LLC and Leila Seto |
| 3:2021cv00787 |
| December 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Report by Plaintiff Quincy Bioscience, LLC (Karnik, Sanjay) |
| Set Telephone Pretrial or Status Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 2/10/2022 at 02:30 PM rescheduled to 2/18/2022 at 01:00 PM to accommodate the court's calendar. Counsel for Plaintiff remains responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. (cak) |
| Filing 12 Answer to #11 Counterclaim by Plaintiff Quincy Bioscience, LLC, Counter Defendant Quincy Bioscience, LLC. (Karnik, Sanjay) |
| Set Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 2/10/2022 at 2:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. #Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached. (arw) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM against Quincy Bioscience, LLC, by Retail Hunter LLC and Leila Seto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Business Solutions Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Intellectual Property Policy) (Cahen, Geoffrey) Modified on 1/3/2022. (lak) |
Filing 10
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #8 Motion to Admit Geoffrey Cahen Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/30/2021. (lak)
|
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Geoffrey Cahen for Defendants Retail Hunter LLC, Leila Seto. (Cahen, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 8 Motion to Admit Geoffrey Cahen Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2985302.) by Defendants Retail Hunter LLC, Leila Seto. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Cahen, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 7 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Leila Seto served on 12/14/2021, answer due 1/4/2022. (Karnik, Sanjay) |
| Filing 6 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Retail Hunter LLC served on 12/14/2021, answer due 1/4/2022. (Karnik, Sanjay) Modified on 12/23/2021: Served 12/15/2021. (lak) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Leila Seto, Retail Hunter LLC, Retail Hunter LLC via Registered Agent. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Retail Hunter LLC, #2 Summons - Retail Hunter LLC via Registered Agent) (arw) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (arw) |
| Standard attachments for District Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (arw) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons by Plaintiff Quincy Bioscience, LLC. (Karnik, Sanjay) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons by Plaintiff Quincy Bioscience, LLC. (Karnik, Sanjay) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons by Plaintiff Quincy Bioscience, LLC. (Karnik, Sanjay) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for False Advertising, Trademark Infringement, and Related Claims against All Defendants. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0758-2977719) filed by Quincy Bioscience, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - PREVAGEN Trademark Registration, #2 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Karnik, Sanjay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
