Innovaport LLC v. Target Corporation
Innovaport LLC |
Target Corporation |
3:2022cv00425 |
August 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0102 Patent - Declaration of Invalidity or Noninfringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #6 Motion to Admit Michael R. Ellis Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/1/2022. (lak) |
Filing 7 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Target Corporation answer due 10/3/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 8/31/2022. (rks) |
Filing 6 Motion to Admit Michael R Ellis Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number AWIWDC-3116782.) by Defendant Target Corporation. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Ellis, Michael) |
Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Target Corporation. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Wyatt, Lance) |
Filing 4 Summons Returned Executed. Target Corporation served on 8/12/2022, answer due 9/2/2022. (Behr, Geoffrey) |
Filing 3 Report on Filing of Patent or Trademark Action. Copy provided to the US Patent and Trademark Office electronically. (lak) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Target Corporation. (lak) |
Filing 1 PATENT COMPLAINT against Target Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3102665.) PATENTS AT ISSUE: Patent # 8,775,260, issued 07/08/2014, held by Innovaport LLC; Patent # 8,787,933, issued 07/22/14, held by Innovaport LLC; Patent # 9,489,690, issued 11/08/16, held by Innovaport LLC; Patent # 9,990,670, issued 06/05/18, held by Innovaport LLC, filed by Innovaport LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - the '260 patent, #2 Exhibit B - the '933 patent, #3 Exhibit C - the '690 patent, #4 Exhibit D - the '670 patent, #5 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons, #7 Report on Filing Patent/Trademark Action) (Griggs, Michael) |
Case directly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Related case 21-cv-418. (lak) |
Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Innovaport LLC v. Target Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Innovaport LLC | |
Represented By: | Geoffrey J. Behr |
Represented By: | Marriam Lin |
Represented By: | Michael Thomas Griggs |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Target Corporation | |
Represented By: | Lance E. Wyatt, Jr. |
Represented By: | Michael R Ellis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.