Janke, Peter et al v. United States of America et al
| Peter E. Janke and Julie A. Janke |
| United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice and United World Life Insurance Company |
| 3:2023cv00072 |
| January 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Justice, United States of America, United World Life Insurance Company. (lak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AWIWDC-3189506.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Summons to United States of America, #3 Summons - Summons to U.S. Department of Justice, #4 Summons - Summons to United World Life Insurance Company) (Laughlin, Theresa) Modified on 1/31/2023: Deleted addresses of all parties. Deleted duplicate defendant. (lak) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
