Polinsky, Tristen v. Nickels, Angie
| Tristen Scott Polinsky |
| Angie Lynn Nickels |
| 3:2024cv00775 |
| November 1, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Anita Marie Boor |
| James D Peterson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendant Angie Lynn Nickels dismissing the case. (jat),(ps) |
Filing 9
ORDER on Leave to Proceed: Leave to proceed denied and case closed. Remaining motions are denied as moot. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 11/26/24. (jat),(ps)
|
| Filing 8 Motion for Legal/Lawyer Assistance (Second Copy) by Plaintiff Tristen Scott Polinsky. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support of Motion for Assistance Recruiting Counsel, #2 Fax Cover Sheets). (lam: Note, submission includes additional attachments from dkt. #6 motion/attachments), (ps) |
| Filing 7 Notice to plaintiff/petitioner regarding #6 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel : Please be advised that this court does not accept faxed case-related submissions. As a one time courtesy the faxed submission has been docketed; no other documents received by fax will be filed in your case. (voc),(ps) |
| Filing 6 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel by Plaintiff Tristen Scott Polinsky. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support of Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #2 Fax Cover Sheet) (voc),(ps) |
| Filing 5 Supplement to #1 Complaint filed by Tristen Scott Polinsky (Amended Relief) (Attachments: #1 Medical Record, #2 Account Statements, #3 Notes including health, condo, threats, #4 Information re loan, #5 Information re additional cases, #6 Child Protective Services Letter, Briarpatch Youth Services Records) (jat),(ps) |
| Filing 4 Supplement to #1 Complaint (Letter to SSA from Appointed Representative) filed by Tristen Scott Polinsky (Attachments: #1 Filing re Dane County Cases 2024CF000170 & 2023CF003091) (jat),(ps) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew R. Wiseman on 11/1/2024. (jef),(ps)
|
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Tristen Scott Polinsky. (jef),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Angie Lynn Nickels, filed by Tristen Scott Polinsky. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 Supplement to Complaint) (jef),(ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Polinsky, Tristen v. Nickels, Angie | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Angie Lynn Nickels | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tristen Scott Polinsky | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
