Christian v. Invao Trading AG et al
Nathan Christian |
Invao Trading AG, Invao Service GMBH and Invao Blockchain Investments LLC |
0:2022cv00023 |
February 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
Alan B Johnson |
Kelly H Rankin |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summonses Issued (Court Staff, stmo) (Main Document 4 replaced on 2/8/2022) (Court Staff, stmo). |
Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment and Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge. The case has been assigned to the Honorable Alan B. Johnson with a referral to Magistrate Judge Kelly H. Rankin. (Court Staff, stmo) |
Filing 2 ERRATA re #1 Complaint (Attorney) by Defendant Nathan Christian. (Attachments: #1 Errata Summons, #2 Errata Summons, #3 Errata Summons) (Cornish, Robert) (Main Document 2 replaced with correct attachment on 2/8/2022) (Court Staff, stmo). Modified text on 2/8/2022 (Court Staff, stmo). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Nathan Christian (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number AWYDC-2060475) Attorney Robert Vaughan Cornish, Jr. added to party Nathan Christian(pty:dft) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits) (Cornish, Robert) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/8/2022) (Court Staff, stmo). Modified text on 2/8/2022 (Court Staff, stmo). Modified text on 2/8/2022 (Court Staff, sbh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.