Leonard v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
Deon A Leonard |
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Robert O Lampert, Eddie Wilson, George Kikircus, George Ross, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Grievance Manager and Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Major |
Wyoming Department of Corrections Grievance Manager, Wyoming Department of Corrections Major and Wyoming Department of Corrections Warden |
1:2019cv00172 |
August 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
Kelly H Rankin |
Scott W Skavdahl |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 28 U.S.C. 1915A SCREENING ORDER by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl. Plaintiff's complaint and request for injunction is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A.(Court Staff, scat) |
Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT re #1 PRISONER Civil Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff Deon A Leonard. (Court Staff, stbd) |
Filing 2 NOTICE (Letter to Clerk) with additional infomation by Movant Deon A Leonard (Court Staff, scat) |
Filing 1 PRISONER Civil Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff Deon A Leonard. (Court Staff, scat) Modified text at the request of Chambers on 8/26/2019 (Court Staff, stbd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.