Dubray v. United States of America
Jaime Lynn Dubray |
United States of America |
1:2022cv00164 |
July 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
Scott W Skavdahl |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RESPONSE to #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Respondent United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Cindi Wood Declaration) (Kubichek, David) |
Filing 7 ORDER by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. It is ORDERED that the United States' Motion for an Extension of Time in Which to Respond to Petitioner's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 is granted for an additional two weeks and that the United States shall file its response on or before September 9, 2022. (cc: Petitioner via U.S. Mail) (Court Staff, skb) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time (Non-Dispositive) requesting extension of Time to Respond to 2255 Motion filed by Respondent United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kubichek, David) |
Filing 5 ORDER by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl denying #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Copy of Order sent to Movant/Defendant via U.S. Mail) (Court Staff, skb) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Petitioner Jaime Lynn Dubray. (Attachments: #1 envelope) (Court Staff, skb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David A Kubichek on behalf of United States of America (Kubichek, David) |
Filing 2 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW UNDER RULE 4 OF THE RULES GOVERNING 2255 PROCEEDINGS by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl. It is ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, Ms. Dubray's stand-alone claim of error based on the amount and/or purity of the methamphetamine attributed to her at sentencing is hereby DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of Ms. Dubray's 2255 motion upon the Government for response to her claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The Government shall file an answer, motion, or other response no later than 28 days from the date of this Order. It is further ORDERED that Ms. Dubray may file a reply to the Government's response no later than 28 days after being served the response. (cc: Petitioner via U.S. Mail) (Court Staff, skb) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Petitioner Jaime Lynn Dubray. (Attachments: #1 envelope) (Court Staff, skb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dubray v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jaime Lynn Dubray | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Nicole M Romine |
Represented By: | David A Kubichek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.