Harrell v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden
Christopher David Harrell |
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden and Seth Norris |
1:2025cv00089 |
March 31, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming |
Scott P Klosterman |
Scott W Skavdahl |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Letter(s) from Christopher D. Harrell requesting copy of docket report. Copy of docket report sent via email to doc-wmci-court@wyo.gov. (Court Staff, semt) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Reconsideration re #2 Order dismissing case, #3 Judgment, filed by Petitioner Christopher David Harrell. (Court Staff, semt) Modified punctuation on 4/14/2025 (Court Staff, semt). |
Filing 3 JUDGMENT against petitioner by the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl. IT IS HERBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED Christopher David Harrell's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and a certificate of appealablity is DENIED. (Court Staff, scat) |
![]() |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5 receipt #2-4462), filed by Christopher David Harrell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (Court Staff, stmo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.